News on U.S. government agencies, U.S. politics, companies doing business with U.S. federal government. Read U.S. national and local news. This site is not affiliated with United States Government.
(USGovernment-News.Com, May 16, 2014 ) New York, NY -- Attorneys working with ClassAction.org are reviewing claims on behalf of property owners who are experiencing problems with their Architect and/or Designer Series Pella windows. Multiple class action lawsuits have been filed against Pella alleging that these windows are defective because moisture can get trapped behind the aluminum cladding, the part responsible for diverting water away from the window. As a result, property owners claim that they have spent thousands of dollars replacing or repairing rotting windows and surrounding areas that suffered water damage.
According to the lawsuits, the aluminum cladding surrounding these windows does not keep water away from the wooden frame. Furthermore, the design of these windows allegedly masks the water-damaged areas, causing the problems to go unnoticed and forcing many property owners to pay to replace the windows themselves after their warranties expired.
Some who were able to submit warranty claims allege that Pella denied their claims without explanation or blamed the problems on improper installation and high moisture levels in their homes; however, property owners allege that professional testing proved that their homes did not exhibit high levels of moisture. In fact, some of these houses were determined to have low moisture levels.
Several property owners have taken their complaints online to the website ConsumerAffairs.com. A slew of one-star reviews claim that property owners began experiencing problems with their Pella windows as early as two years after they were installed. Some reported spending $10,000 to remove and replace the rotting windows, and others claim that Pella charged them $100 service fees to inspect their windows and attempt to solve the problems using foam seals or rubber stoppers.
According to the lawsuit, Pella knew its windows could fail well before their expected lifetime – even when installed properly – and the plaintiffs allege that the company purposely drafted its warranty to avoid consumers’ claims for replacement windows.
In addition to compensation for the cost of the windows, the plaintiffs are requesting that Pella reassess all of the previously denied warranty claims and inspect properties for signs of rotting and other damage.
In light of these complaints, attorneys working with ClassAction.org would like to hear from homeowners with Pella’s Architect and/or Designer Series windows. These consumers may be able to file lawsuits seeking compensation for the cost to remove and replace rotting windows. For more information, visit http://www.classaction.org/pella-windows today and fill out our free case review form.
About ClassAction.org
Class Action.org is dedicated to protecting consumers and investors in class actions and complex litigation throughout the United States. Class Action.org keeps consumers informed about product alerts, recalls, and emerging litigation and helps them take action against the manufacturers of defective products, drugs, and medical devices. Information about consumer fraud issues and environmental hazards is also available on the site. Visit ClassAction.org today for a no cost, no obligation case evaluation and information about your consumer rights.
We are pleased to offer you this exciting, new, and entirely free professional resource. Visit our Free Industry resource center today to browse our selection of 600+ complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more. Get popular titles including:
